TL;DR
Breezy HR pricing in 2026 stays position-based across four tiers, from a free Bootstrap plan to $439 per month for Business on annual billing.
- Bootstrap is genuinely free forever, but capped at one active position, which stops working after roughly two to three hires.
- Startup at $157 per month (annual) unlocks unlimited candidate pipelines and is the tier most SMBs actually land on.
- Growth at $273 per month and Business at $439 per month add reporting depth, custom fields, and richer integrations.
- Three unrelated products share the "Breezy" name: breezy.hr is the ATS, getbreezy.app is an AI receptionist, and breezy.io is a partner discovery tool.
- The published price is not the full cost, because screening time on the applications Breezy collects is a line item nobody quotes.
Which "Breezy" Are You Actually Looking At?
Three separate products rank on the same query, and none of them disambiguate on the SERP. If you searched breezy pricing and clicked around, you have probably seen conflicting prices without noticing you were reading about three different companies.
Breezy HR at breezy.hr is the applicant tracking system this post is about. It has been around since 2014 and sells four position-based plans for recruiting teams. That is almost certainly what you meant.
getbreezy.app sells an AI receptionist, website, and CRM bundle for service businesses starting at $50 per month, with a free tier of its own. It is not hiring software. If you landed on a "Book AI receptionist" page and thought you had found Breezy HR's cheap tier, you had not.
breezy.io is a partner discovery tool for channel programs. Different product, different buyer, different pricing. The overlap is name only.
The rest of this post is about breezy.hr specifically. Every dollar figure below is theirs.
What Breezy HR Pricing Actually Looks Like in 2026
Breezy HR uses a four-tier position-based rate card. Unlike per-user pricing, you pay for the number of active roles you can post at once, not the size of your recruiting team. That is the single most useful thing to internalise before comparing tiers.
Direct from breezy.hr, on annual billing, the current numbers are:
| Plan | Annual price | Active positions | Who it fits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bootstrap | Free | 1 | One-off hires |
| Startup | $157 / mo | Unlimited | Small teams hiring steadily |
| Growth | $273 / mo | Unlimited | Multiple hiring managers |
| Business | $439 / mo | Unlimited | Larger, structured teams |
Monthly billing is roughly 20% higher on every paid tier: Startup lands near $189 per month, Growth near $329, and Business near $529. On a three-year horizon that difference is not trivial.
An applicant tracking system (ATS) is the software recruiters use to post jobs, collect candidates, run interview stages, and record decisions. Breezy sits in the small-to-mid-market segment of that category, priced well below enterprise suites and above pure free tools.
Where the Breezy HR Free Tier Stops Working
Bootstrap is a real free-forever plan, not a trial. That framing is unusual in the ATS market and worth understanding before you get excited about it.
The catch is the position cap. You get one active job posting at a time, one candidate pool, and one user. That is enough to run a single search cleanly. It is not enough to run a second before the first closes.
Model it against actual hiring volume and the shape becomes clear. A five-person startup filling one role every two to three months can live on Bootstrap indefinitely. A ten-person company opening a second role two weeks after the first has already outgrown it.
The published free tier also excludes automated candidate scoring, custom questionnaires, and calendar integrations. So the practical breakpoint arrives sooner than the position count suggests: for most teams it is the first parallel search, or the moment you want to schedule interviews without leaving the tool.
There is no application-volume cap on Bootstrap, only a position cap. That distinction matters, because Breezy will happily accept several hundred applications on a single free job. The bill does not go up. Your screening time does.
What Bootstrap, Startup, Growth, and Business Actually Give You
The plan-to-plan feature gates on Breezy HR are more about workflow depth than raw capacity.
Startup ($157/mo annual) adds unlimited positions, candidate management pipelines with drag-and-drop stages, a career site builder, basic interview scheduling, and integrations with common job boards. It is where most small businesses land after outgrowing Bootstrap, and where the price stops being invisible.
Growth ($273/mo) adds automated candidate scoring, custom scorecards for interviewers, offer management, e-signature, and richer reporting. This is the tier that turns Breezy from "a place to collect resumes" into something recruiters actually plan against.
Business ($439/mo) adds SSO, custom user roles, advanced permissions, and API access for building against your own systems. It is the tier that clears the security and administrative reviews an enterprise buying team runs before signing.
Read the plans against your workflow, not against the feature grid. A team of three that already lives in Slack and Google Calendar gets more from Startup's integrations than a team of ten that would use Growth's scorecards for one week and then stop.
How Breezy HR Pricing Compares to Workable, JazzHR, and BambooHR
Breezy sits in a crowded SMB ATS segment. Three names come up in almost every buying conversation: Workable, JazzHR, and BambooHR. Each prices differently, and the comparison is rarely apples to apples.
Workable publishes a Standard plan under $300 per month for teams below twenty employees, then quotes Premier at custom pricing. Its pricing scales by headcount rather than by job count, so it behaves oppositely to Breezy: a growing team's bill rises even when the number of open roles does not.
JazzHR starts materially cheaper at $75 per month for Hero on annual billing, with Plus and Pro climbing toward $420. It caps Hero at three jobs, so its cheap tier is closer to Breezy's Bootstrap in shape than its price suggests.
BambooHR is not a pure ATS. It bundles HRIS, payroll, and time tracking, and its ATS module is one part of a broader HR platform. It publishes no rate card, which means every buyer negotiates. If you only want hiring software, you are paying for HRIS features you will not use.
Position-based pricing is Breezy's most differentiated pitch. If you have a small recruiting team hiring for many open roles at once, Breezy is the only one of the four whose bill does not move with team size. If you have a large team hiring for few roles, Workable's headcount model may cost less.
Where the Real Cost Hides: Screening Time on Top of the Licence
Every ATS pricing page frames the decision as licence cost versus feature list. That framing misses the biggest line item in Round 1 hiring: the recruiter time spent screening what the ATS collects.
SHRM's Talent Acquisition benchmarks put screening at roughly 80% of time-to-hire across US employers. The ATS licence does not change that number. It only changes how quickly resumes arrive to be screened.
Run it as arithmetic against a real hiring plan. A Startup-tier buyer opening five roles that pull 200 applications each collects 1,000 resumes in a month. At three minutes of recruiter attention per application, that is 50 hours of screening, or roughly $1,500 in loaded recruiter salary at a $60,000 base. The Startup licence itself is $157 per month.
Push it to a Growth-tier buyer running fifteen open roles at the same application rate and the screening load is 150 hours per month, close to a full-time recruiter. The licence is $273. The people cost is roughly 20x higher.
This is the number the SERP does not model. It is also where a layer that automates Round 1 pays for itself before the ATS does. LinkedIn Talent Solutions' hiring benchmarks put average recruiter capacity between 30 and 40 roles per year for mid-market employers, which is why the same team that fits comfortably on Startup can still burn out on screening.
Fabric's Interview Engine sits on top of an existing ATS, including Breezy. It screens, scores, and shortlists Round 1 candidates before a human recruiter or panel gets involved. It does not make the hiring decision; the panel does.
That is the narrow description of it. Fabric also runs the steps before the interview: defining requirements, sourcing, activating passive candidates who never see a job post, and outreach. For a team on Breezy's Startup tier, the practical effect is that inbound applications and outbound search arrive in the same screened shortlist.
When Breezy HR Pricing Is the Right Buy, and When It Isn't
Breezy HR is the right buy in three shapes.
The first is the small business hiring steadily but not constantly, two to five roles at a time, with a single recruiter and a handful of hiring managers. Startup at $157 covers the workflow cleanly and the position-based pricing does not punish the team for adding a fifth interviewer.
The second is the growing team that wants an ATS the recruiter can operate without training, and where the licence spend has to justify itself against a small hiring plan. Growth at $273 sits well below what a typical enterprise ATS quotes for the same seat count.
The third is the team already using getbreezy.app or another Breezy-adjacent tool who assumed Breezy HR was the same company. It is not, but Breezy HR is still a defensible ATS choice on its own merits.
Breezy is the wrong buy in two shapes. If you are hiring at high volume, the licence cost stops being your problem long before the position count does, and the screening load will eclipse any pricing decision you make on the ATS itself. And if you need embedded HRIS, payroll, and time tracking, a bundled HR platform will price better than Breezy plus three other tools.
The breezy pricing decision, then, is not really a plan comparison. It is a question about which side of the screening cost line you sit on before you sign anything.
FAQ
How much does Breezy HR cost?
Breezy HR runs from a free Bootstrap plan to $439 per month on annual billing for the Business tier, with Startup at $157 per month and Growth at $273 per month annually. Monthly billing is roughly 20% higher across every paid tier.
How much does Breezy cost?
The applicant tracking system Breezy HR costs between $0 and $439 per month on annual billing across four tiers. The other two products named Breezy, at getbreezy.app and breezy.io, are unrelated and priced separately.
Is Breezy HR really free?
The Bootstrap plan is free forever for one active position, one candidate pool, and one user. It works for one-off hires but forces an upgrade the moment you need to run a second search in parallel.
What are the pros and cons of Breezy HR?
The pros are position-based pricing that scales with roles rather than recruiters and a genuinely free tier, while the cons are that reporting, scorecards, and richer integrations are gated to Growth or Business.
Is Breezy an applicant tracking system?
Yes. Breezy HR at breezy.hr is a full ATS covering job posting, candidate pipelines, interview scheduling, offer management, and reporting.
How much does Breezy HR cost per month in 2026?
On monthly billing, Startup runs around $189, Growth around $329, and Business around $529 per month. Annual billing brings those to $157, $273, and $439 respectively.
How do I choose the right Breezy HR plan?
Match the plan to your workflow depth, not your team size. Startup covers most small businesses; Growth adds scorecards and offer management for teams with several hiring managers; Business adds SSO, API access, and the controls larger buyers ask for.
Related Posts
- What Is an ATS? Applicant Tracking Systems Explained
- 30 AI Recruitment Platforms Ranked for 50+ Hires a Month
- 9 AI Recruiting Tools That Hold Up Past 50 Hires a Month
- Top 30 AI Resume Screening Tools for Faster and Efficient Hiring
- The Recruitment Process Explained: A Complete Guide
Conclusion
Breezy HR pricing is easier to read than most of the SMB ATS market. The four tiers are named clearly, priced publicly, and gated on workflow depth rather than headcount. That alone puts it ahead of vendors who force a sales call to see a number.
The number the pricing page does not show is the screening cost sitting on top of the licence. That cost scales with applications, not with tier, and it is what turns a $157 licence into a five-figure operational bill by the end of a busy quarter.
Choose Breezy for the hiring plan you actually have, not the one on the demo. If the plan involves screening more than a hundred applications a month, budget for the layer that reads them before you budget for the ATS that stores them.